The long migration home for Oralmans
More than 750,000 Kazakh repatriates settle in motherland
By Maral Tazhibayeva
2010-01-12
ALMATY, Kazakhstan -- “In the morning I wake up, look out the window and I cannot believe that I am in Kazakhstan.
“I am afraid that all these years are a dream, and I am still in China. When I reassure myself everything is OK, my heart is at ease and free”.
Six years ago, Tanjaryk, now 25, moved with his parents from China to Almaty under a repatriation programme for ethnic Kazakhs. While his family had lived in China for several generations, they never quite fit in, continuing to speak Kazakh as their first language.
When the Chinese government began to eliminate Kazakh language schools and required fluency in Chinese in order to attend college, the family decided to leave. They took advantage of the repatriation programme launched 18 years ago.
Some 192,000 families, or 760,000 Oralmans, as the repatriates are known, have taken advantage of the programme, now called Nurly Kosh (Blessed Migration). The programme reimburses relocation costs, and provides repatriates with money for housing and financial support. A percentage of seats in universities and other institutions of higher learning are set aside for the Oralmans.
“Just in the last 10 years, around a million Kazakhs settled in the republic”, said Almaty State University sociologist Azimbai Gali.
“The actual number of Kazakhs arriving in Kazakhstan is significantly higher than those cited”.
Tanjaryk received a university degree in architecture – and learned Russian. The money the government gave them helped his family build a home in the suburbs and Tanjaryk now earns a living through farming.
In 2009, President Nursultan Nazarbayev raised the number of families to 20,000 from 15,000 annually. The government has budgeted 17 billion tenge (about US $130 M) for the migrants.
“I see only positive sides to the return of the Oralmans”,Dos Koshim, leader of the national patriotic movement Ult Tagdyry, told Central Asia Online. “The duty of the Kazakh government is to return people who had to leave the country during the difficult years”.
Thanks to the Oralmans, said Gali, the proportion of ethnic Kazakhs in Kazakhstan has grown from 48 percent of the total population in 1989 to about 67 percent in 2009.
“They also help fill the outflow of Slavic and German populations abroad”, he said. “By 2009 we succeeded in restoring the population to the size it had in 1989. The rapid reproduction of Kazakhs and the new repatriates will ensure the sustained growth of the population of Kazakhstan from now on”.
A large number of ethnic Slavs and Germans left Kazakhstan between 1991 and 2000, taking advantage of repatriation programs and freedom to leave the country. But Gali says the movement of Kazakhs into and out of the country is nothing new.
“The migrational exchange of Kazakhs from the near and far abroad has been continuous since the very inception of the Kazakh Khanate”, said Gali. “… Some left the territory in hard times and returned in times of stabilisation. Migration is a form of existence for the Kazakhs.”
But life for the repatriated Oralmans is not always easy. According to the programme, roughly half of the repatriated families lack housing, and the programme’s authors write: “There is no multifaceted approach or co-ordination between state administrative bodies engaged in resolving migration issues”. They say a third of all working-age Oralmans are unemployed, and that despite reserved spots in higher education institutions it is difficult for them to get an education.
All families of five or more people receive about 833,000 tenge ($5,500) for housing. Tanjaryk said his family used that money to build a foundation for a house, and then built the rest on their own. Asar, the ancient Kazakh custom of neighbours, friends and relatives helping build a home, assisted them in construction.
“I am not complaining”, he said. “It is enough that I am not a second-class citizen here. I have the ability to work and I am thankful.”
“Four or five years ago,… it was possible to buy a house on the money they were allocated. In this time of economic crisis, you can’t even buy a bathroom. The authorities should commit themselves to providing the Oralmans with housing”, Koshim said.
While repatriates from post-Soviet countries settle relatively easily due to similarities in mentality, education and knowledge of the Russian language, it is more complicated for people from the “far abroad”.
“Mongolian Oralmans have problems of the everyday sort because they still live in the 18th and 19th centuries and are psychologically unable to adapt”, said Koshim.
The biggest challenge for Oralmans from China and Mongolia, according to him, is the widespread use of the Russian language in Kazakhstan. “They did not expect to face problems in their everyday lives and with employment due to this ignorance.”
With some ethnic Slavic migrants now wishing to return, the repatriation programme has been changed to accept not only ethnic Kazakhs, but others who left Kazakhstan and now wish to return.
Some however see a problem with the inflow of the Oralmans.
“If one part of Kazakhstan’s population understands and wants to help, then the second (ethnic Slavs) is outraged that for years they have not been able to receive apartments and the Oralmans will get them out of turn. Five or six years ago local residents even picketed (in protest)”, Koshim said.













Post a Comment ( Comment Policy )
Reader Comments
With greetings! It was a good research article. God willing, all the Kyrgyz living in other countries will come back to their homeland.
It is an excellent article. I will say something about those discontent that oralmans receive aid from the government. There are fewer people discontent with it among the Kazakhs. More people are discontent among the Slavs. In essence, there is little reason for discontent. The oralmans get about $5000 per family, part of which goes to pay kickbacks, which leaves them without any advantage over the locals. Considering that oralmans are the descendants of those who fled the horrors of collectivization - it is the duty of the government to help those living abroad against their will. Russia has the same program and, as far as I understand, it does not cause discontent.
cool
Why haven't you published my comment on the story? Koshim unreasonably expressed an opinion about the Slavs who are opposed to the return of oralmans. This is not true. Not only Slavs but also people of other nationalities, who waited for housing for years but cannot get it because of changes in economic relations, are opposed to the allocation of housing to oralmans.
A very interesting story, I read it with pleasure. But the conclusion that only ethnic Slavs protest the allocation of housing to oralmans is not supported by any examples or facts. Moreover, a person of any ethnic background who has lived in Kazakhstan all his/her life and dreamed of having his/her own home would be outraged when housing is given to newcomers in the first place. The newcomers did not work for this country, they just came here and are waiting for various benefits without giving anything in return. This is a normal psychological reaction of any man, and his nationality does not matter here, Mr. Koshim, you should not stir up negative emotions toward certain nationalities, this is a crime punishable under the law.